The Uncertainty of Science

I know the scientists out there (if they ever read this) would be saying to themselves "Ok we've got another religious zealot on our hands" by my title. But that wouldn't be true. I have recently been in a discussion with an Atheist over Evolution and Darwinism. It was very friendly for the most part until he must have gotten desperate. What really struck me with him is that he was very good at refuting the people and institutions I got my information from. Saying they were biased towards Intelligent Design and therefore could not be trusted with their findings and research. What he was not good at however was challenging the substance of my arguments, regardless of who they came from. He boasted that one of the main advantages of science is their "open-mindedness and ability to think out of the box to find the answers". If that be the case, why has the argument ended on Intelligent Design being a possibility? Especially since Darwinists or Evolutionists have yet to find out how the tiny, extremely complex, yet simplest of life-forms came into being. I mean, its not like scientists have ever been wrong before right?

Check out the article below to see how the most important theories in Physics just may be totally wrong. Here is a quote from one of the Nobel Prize winning scientists, “It’s got symmetry, it’s super and it's been taught in Europe for decades as the correct model because it is so beautiful,” he said. “But there's no experimental data to say that it is correct.”
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-08/latest-lhc-results-question-supersymmetry-underpinning-string-theory-and-answer-why-were-here


So since we cannot find what caused life to form and since we cannot provide any genetic information that shows one species ever transformed into another, whose to say that Darwin's version of evolution just might have it wrong as well?